Licence number: all ten cashiers in this panel alone

Licence number — whether a number resolves in a public register. Across the nine read cashiers this panel runs from 0 to 1: 4 have it and 5 do not.

This panel is not added into width. It is printed separately on the card because it measures a different thing, and adding different units together into a single score is exactly where most ratings stop being true.

Where a cashier's panel could not be read, a dash is printed and the value is left out of the total. A dash is not a zero: a zero is a claim, a dash is an absence. Any total containing one is labelled a floor here, never a total.

The sixth panel is not an opinion about a cashier but a line an outsider can look up. 4 of 10 print a number that resolves in a public register; the rest print none we could read, and the panel stays blank rather than being filled with an assumption.

A blank here is not a verdict. It records that nothing was found, which is a different statement from "there is nothing" — and the difference is the reason the card prints a blank instead of a zero anywhere a figure is missing.

One of the 4 rows also names the company recorded as holding the number, and that is a separate line from the number itself. A number that resolves and a holder that is named are two different amounts of evidence, so the card prints the holder where it exists instead of treating every resolved number as equal.